7 known sites – potential total no of sites 70. Using the suggested proxies of 2 genets/site and 10 ramets/genet results in 1400 mature individuals. Whereby it could qualify for NT D1.
The assessment is based on the evaluated rareness of the species. The fact that its distribution is within an area that has a long history of mycologists specialized in collecting specimens in this particular taxonomical group, and that the number of collections still is strongly limited despite the species distinctive and striking appearance.
We estimate the total number of sites to be less than 100 and hence the population of mature individuals not to exceed 1400. The few records does not enable calculations of population trends. Therefore, the species is assessed as Near Threatened using the criterion D1.
Described in 1998 from Macon County, North Carolina; since found from seven locations within 600 km to the south and west of this site.
It is easily distinguished by the bright golden yellow color of the entire fruitbody, lack of staining reaction, and medium to large size.
Most similar is Boletus auriflammeus; a smaller species with a bright yellow to golden yellow cap and stipe, and typically paler pores. Besides the smaller size, it can be distinguished from B. aurantiosplendens by the whitish flesh, very finely powdery cap and stipe when young, and matted fibrillose cap in age. It’s a widespread, but uncommon species in hardwood forest across the southeast and mid Atlantic.
Buchwaldoboletus species have plush, often velvety cap, blue staining pores and often grow on, or near decaying pine stumps.
Tylopilus balloui has an orange cap, buff to pinkish buff pores and stipe that darken with age and whitish flesh.
A very conspicuous ectomycorrhizal fungus associated with hardwoods. Obviously rare and known only from 7 locations. The species is described as late as in 1998. The appearance is distinct with it’s bright, striking colours and in this area with a history of frequent monitoring by mycologists specializing on boletes it would have been noticed more frequently if the species was not rare.
Described in 1998 from Macon County, North Carolina; since found from seven locations within 600 km to the south and west of this site. Known from central and western North Carolina, western South Carolina, northern Georgia and eastern Tennessee.
Currently known from seven locations suggest that this fungus is rare, and relatively range restricted. Because it was described fairly recently, and so few locations are known, it’s not feasible to assess the population trend.
Known from three collections (from two locations) on MycoPortal and four observations (one of which is questionable) on Mushroom Observer (2016), and a single location from a social media posting (2015).
We estimate the total number of sites to be 70, bases on the relatively small geographical range, number of mycologist who have collected and worked on boletes in this area, and the relative ease to see and identify this species.
We have 7 known sites ; x10 =potential total no of sites 70. Using the suggested proxies of 2 genets/site and 10 ramets/genet results in 1400 mature individuals.
Population Trend: Uncertain
Very little is known about the preference of this species. Mature southern cove hardwood forest, with American Beech, Oak, Hickory, and Tulip Popular. Likely mycorrhizal with hardwoods.
CAN SOMETHIN MORE SPECIFICALLY BE SAID ABOUT THE HABITAT - THE DESCRIPTION BE FLESHED OUT A LITTLE BIT MORE?
Although there are many small threats to southeastern cove hardwood forest, (localized logging, urban development, increase in nitrogen, moonshine stills) there is no single threat that one can pinpoint for a decline in this species.
If this species is found to be associated with American Beech (Fagus grandifolia), then the spread of beech bark disease (the combination of a scale insect Cryptococcus fagisuga, and a couple of species of the fungus Nectria) should be considered a serious threat; Gora, et. al. (1996)
A better understanding of it’s preferred habitat; very little is known about the preferences of this species. Does it need mature or old growth? Early succession? Identify the mycorrhizal host; if it’s associated with beech, beech bark disease is a serious threat.
Baroni, T.J. 1998. Boletus aurantiosplendens sp. nov.from the southern Appalachian Mountains with notes on Pulveroboletus auriflammeus, Pulveroboletus melleouluteus and Boletus auripes. Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences. 36:245-255
Bessette AE, Roody WC, Bessette AR. (2000). North American Boletes. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press.
Gora, V., König, J.,Lunderstädt, J 1996. Population dynamics of beech scale (Cryptococcus fagisuga) (Coccina, Pseudococcidae) related to physiological defence reactions of attacked beech trees (Fagus sylvatica). Chemoecology, 7(2):112-120; 30 ref.