• Proposed
  • Under Assessment
  • 3Preliminary Assessed
  • 4Assessed
  • 5Published

Lyophyllum favrei (R. Haller Aar. & R. Haller Suhr) R. Haller Aar. & R. Haller Suhr

Go to another Suggested Species...

Scientific name
Lyophyllum favrei
Author
(R. Haller Aar. & R. Haller Suhr) R. Haller Aar. & R. Haller Suhr
Common names
Gilded domecap
Favre's Schwärzling
IUCN Specialist Group
Mushroom, Bracket and Puffball
Kingdom
Fungi
Phylum
Basidiomycota
Class
Agaricomycetes
Order
Agaricales
Family
Lyophyllaceae
Assessment status
Under Assessment
Proposed by
Beatrice Senn-Irlet
Assessors
Martyn Ainsworth
Contributors
Begoña Aguirre-Hudson, Ibai Olariaga Ibarguren, Beatrice Senn-Irlet
Comments etc.
Anders Dahlberg, Vera Hayova, Beatrice Senn-Irlet

Assessment Status Notes

Taxonomic notes

Based on molecular analysis (Hofstetter et al. 2002) and taking account of Redhead et al.‘s (2006) proposal to conserve the name Lyophyllum with a different type, Calocybe favrei should be adopted as the current name for this species. This has no bearing on the conservation assessment


Why suggested for a Global Red List Assessment?

A conspicuously brightly-coloured and rare litter-inhabiting species characteristically found in Fagus woodland and old alluvial forest habitats. It can fruit, sometimes in abundance, over many years (decades) at the same spot (site-faithful). It has relatively few European sites (ca. 50) with a stronghold of ca. 32 sites in Switzerland (where it is considered to be moderately threatened and showing some decline due to river management). Elsewhere in Europe, there are very few (>5) sites per country where it is vulnerable to destruction by chance or accident (stochastic events). For example, one of 2 discrete post-1960 fruiting patches known in England was chosen as the site for a habitat-management bonfire and no further fruiting has been observed there. The other post-1960 fruiting patch (both were in the same woodland) has been similarly unproductive since the highly damaging “Great Storm” of 1987 which uprooted many beeches in the area.
The geographic range cannot be described as “severely fragmented” because there is an obvious European population stronghold in Switzerland. This, together with the high number of locations (>10)  precludes the use of subcriteria B1a and B2a. Added to this, the lack of extreme population fluctuations effectively rules out the application of Criterion B. Although there has been some loss of sites, this decline cannot be expressed as a percentage population reduction, thereby ruling out the application of Criterion A. 
Criterion C was judged to be applicable based on this fungus having a small population with some decline occurring. World total: 47 known fruiting patches for which we assume 1 genet per fruiting patch (of <10m diam.) and 10 ramets per patch giving a total of 470 mature individuals to which an estimate of as yet unknown sites should be added. 47 fruiting patches equates to a maximum AOO value of 188km2 if we assume all patches are located in distinct tetrads (squares of area 4km2).
Even when unknown sites are considered it is expected that Switzerland will remain the stronghold site with 32 known fruiting patches (=320 mature individuals). Switzerland has been well-surveyed and further discoveries of new sites are expected to be few in number. The Swiss sites are localised in a series of river catchments and so it is not appropriate to consider this series as one large subpopulation at the continental scale. Applying Criterion C at the European scale with an estimated global total of mature individuals of <2,500 and <250 mature individuals per subpopulation, this species is assessed as EN C2a(i). Applying Criterion D , the estimated global total of mature individuals (470 + those as yet unrecorded) is expected to be <1,000 and would lead to an assessment of VU D1. 
Globally it as assessed similarly as EN or VU as it is expected to be similarly rare and sparsely distributed across Russia (Asian populations)


Geographic range

Mainly found across central Europe from Spain to Russia with a stronghold in Switzerland.


Population and Trends

France: 3 sites post-1980 with one in a protected area (P.-A. Moreau pers. comm.).
Germany:1 Bavarian (Starnberg) site post-1980
Greece:1 site post-1980
Italy:2 sites post-1980
Ireland: one post-1980 record (voucher not traced) from Co. Limerick (H. Fox pers. comm.). Other Irish records/collections assigned to L. favrei f. ochracea are excluded from this assessment as this is now recognised as a species in its own right, L. ochraceum or, preferably, Calocybe ochracea.
Russia: The following information was supplied by Alexander Kovalenko (AK) via Tatyana Svetasheva who obtained further details regarding the data AK submitted for the “33 threatened fungi in Europe” report.  AK: “indeed we have an old record about the presence of Lyophyllum favrei in South-West of Russia (probably Adygea or Karachaevo-Cherkesia), but unfortunately it is very incomplete and doesn’t contain the exact data of locality”. One site known
Spain: I. Olariaga: “2 localities in the Iberian Peninsula (Catalonia, Basque area). The Basque vouchered record is recent in a calcareous Fagus forest. Apart from that, we have not come across this species in the past 20 years in the Basque area”
Switzerland: exclusively in the north of the country on the banks of alpine rivers (ca.32 sites) the European and world stronghold. Such a highly conspicuous mushroom (with a high public profile) is unlikely to have been overlooked in such a well-surveyed country and therefore it is thought that almost all extant fruiting sites will already be documented (B. Senn-Irlet). 
UK: One calcareous Fagus-dominated woodland with 2 potentially extant fruiting patches in different parts of the site recorded since 1960 but despite repeated surveys no sightings since 1987. One of these patches was used, one week after its discovery, as a site for a site-management bonfire and mycelium likely to have been destroyed. The other patch is likely to have been adversely affected by the great storm of 1987 which uprooted many beeches in this woodland. Currently unofficially (2006) assessed in GB as CR (it would qualify today as CRD based on an assumption of two existing genets each of 10 IUCN-compliant mature individuals giving a total of 20 mature individuals plus any estimated to exist elsewhere in the country but never recorded)
Ukraine: 1 site recorded in Crimea in 1992 (Moser 1993) under Fagus sylvatica ssp. moesiaca in Alma valley (Yalta Mountain Forest Nature Reserve). No further localities known (V. Hayova pers.comm.) Assessed as Endangered in 2011.

Population Trend:


Habitat and Ecology

A litter-inhabiting, saprotrophic species of broadleaved, mainly Fagus, woodland and,especially in the Swiss stronghold, old alluvial forest sites, often on calcareous soil.

Temperate Forest

Threats

Habitat destruction (man-made and storm/flood damage), unsympathetic river bank and forest management, tourism (too heavy trampling in these alluvial forests).
The English site receives indirect protection as a statutory Site of Special Scientific Interest, but as L. favrei is not explicitly mentioned in the legal documentation (the citation) as an interest feature, technically its requirements do not have to be taken into account during site management planning. In the past, the fungus has been damaged or destroyed by inappropriate siting of a management bonfire. In view of increasing incidence of extreme weather events, there is also a potential threat from windthrow of Fagus trees causing mycelial damage and death.

Residential & commercial developmentTourism & recreation areasWood & pulp plantationsUnintentional effects: subsistence/small scale (species being assessed is not the target) [harvest]Other ecosystem modifications

Conservation Actions

Exact positions of fruiting patches to be plotted on site managers’ maps and referred to when forest or river management work is being planned to ensure that areas with fruiting populations of this fungus are taken into account and not damaged. Protection of all fruiting sites is required. Site information should be passed to local authorities.

Site/area protectionSite/area managementHabitat & natural process restorationAwareness & communications

Research needed

Population structure should be investigated and environmental samples from areas formerly supporting fruiting should be probed for species-specific DNA markers to see if fungus is still present in those areas in a non-fruiting (mycelial) state.


Bibliography

Dahlberg A. & Croneborg H (2006). 33 threatened fungi in Europe. ECCF
ESCÀNEZ, Ll.; (2010); Calocybe favrei (R. Haller Aar. & R. Haller Suhr) Bon, novetat pel catàleg de la Flora Micològica del Berguedà.; MOIXERÓ. Fongs i Flora del Pirineu, 1:
Escanez Monferrer Ll. (2011) Calocybe favrei (R. Haller Aar. & R. Haller Suhr) Bon. Bolets de Catalunya, de la Peninsula ibèrica I de las Illes Balears : lam. 1458. Societat Catalana de Micologia
Evans S., Henrici, A. & Ing, B. 2006. Red data list of threatened British fungi (preliminary assessment) http://www.fieldmycology.net/Download/RDL_of_ Threatened_ British_ Fungi.pdf
Hofstetter, V., Clémençon, H., Vilgalys, R. & Moncalvo, J.-M. (2002). Phylogenetic analyses of the Lyophylleae (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) based on nuclear and mitochondrial rDNA sequences. Mycol. Res. 106(9): 1043–1059
Legon, N.W. (1989a) Profiles of Fungi 21-22. Mycologist 3(3): 142
Legon, N.W. (1989b) Fungi from Norbury Park, Surrey, 1984–88. Mycologist 3(3): 131–132
Moser M. 1993. Remarkable species of Agaricales collected in the Crimean Mountains (Ukraine). – Ukrainian Botanical Journal. – 50 (4): 93-103.
or
Moser, M. 1993. Remarkable species of Agaricales collected in the Crimean mountains (Ukraine). Український ботанічний журнал/ Ukrainskyi Botanichnyi Zhurnal [Ukrainian Botanical Journal], 42 (4): 103–104.
Redhead, S.A., Hofstetter, V., Clémençon, H., Moncalvo, J.-M. & Vilgalys, R. (2006). Proposal to conserve the name Lyophyllum with a conserved type (Basidiomycota). Taxon 55(4): 1034–1036.
Reid D.A. 1958. New or interesting records of British Hymenomycetes II. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 41(4): 419–445.
Senn-Irlet B. (2012) http://www.wsl.ch/dienstleistungen/publikationen/pdf/12111.pdf


Known distribution - countries

Regional Population and Trends

Country Trend Redlisted