• Proposed
  • Under Assessment
  • VUPreliminary Assessed
  • 4Assessed
  • 5Published

Tropicoporus drechsleri Salvador-Montoya & Popoff

Go to another Suggested Species...

Scientific name
Tropicoporus drechsleri
Author
Salvador-Montoya & Popoff
Common names
 
IUCN Specialist Group
Mushroom, Bracket and Puffball
Kingdom
Fungi
Phylum
Basidiomycota
Class
Agaricomycetes
Order
Hymenochaetales
Family
Hymenochaetaceae
Assessment status
Preliminary Assessed
Preliminary Category
VU C2a(ii)
Proposed by
MIND.Funga Initiative
Assessors
Felipe Bittencourt, E. Ricardo Drechsler-Santos, Thiago Kossmann, Kelmer Martins da Cunha, Carlos A. Salvador Montoya
Comments etc.
MIND.Funga Initiative, James Westrip
Reviewers
Gregory Mueller

Assessment Notes

Justification

Tropicoporus drechsleri is currently known from some sites in Argentina, in the Chaco and Selva Misionera (Atlantic Forest), and one site in Brazil, in the western part of Santa Catarina State (also in the Atlantic Forest). The species is a specific parasite of Cordia americana, and its distribution is expected to match that of its host, ranging between 20º-30º S latitude in South America, from the Atlantic Forest to the east up to the Andean mountains to the west, in the Chaco domain. It is also expected to be found in Bolivia, Paraguay and Uruguay. There are an estimated 400-500 sites throughout its host’s distribution, each containing 10-20 mature individuals. Total population is estimated at 5,000 to 10,000 mature individuals distributed in one subpopulation. Due to the Atlantic Forest and Chaco loss of area in the past, and the current situation in areas where the species occurs, there is an inferred population size reduction of 10-20% in 70 years (three generations, based on the phenology of the host tree),Tropicoporus drechsleri is classified as Vulnerable.


Taxonomic notes

Tropicoporus drechsleri was recently described by Salvador-Montoya et al. (2018), based on molecular phylogenetic analysis (although it is morphologically distinctive), being a new species in the “Inonotus linteus” species complex. The collections examined to determine the species were previously identified as Tropicoporus linteus (Berk. & M.A.Curtis) L.W.Zhou & Y.C.Dai.


Why suggested for a Global Red List Assessment?

Tropicoporus drechsleri is a parasitic, host specific polypore fungus that is found growing exclusively on Cordia americana, a hardwood species that occurs between 20º to 30º latitude of South America, from Atlantic Forest to Chaco domain near the Andean Mountains. Up to now, the species was recorded for Argentina and Brazil, but its distribution likely follows that of its host into Bolivia, Paraguay and Uruguay.
The species is assessed as Vulnerable (VU) A2c+C1+2a(ii).


Geographic range

Tropicoporus drechsleri is currently known from some sites in Argentina, in the Chaco and Selva Misionera (Atlantic Forest), and one site in Brazil, in the western part of Santa Catarina State (also in the Atlantic Forest). The species is a specific parasite of Cordia americana, and its distribution is expected to match that of its host, ranging between 20º-30º S latitude in South America, from the Atlantic Forest to the east up to the Andean mountains to the west, in the Chaco domain. It is also expected to be found in Bolivia, Paraguay and Uruguay.

Based on the its host distribution and population density, T. drechsleri is expected to be more abundant in the Atlantic Forest, followed by the Chaco domain.


Population and Trends

The species has a total of 18 records in 8 sites, most of them from Argentina, near the type locality, and just one occurrence in Brazil. There are an estimated 400-500 sites throughout its host’s distribution, each containing 10-20 mature individuals. Total population is estimated at 5,000 to 10,000 mature individuals distributed in one subpopulation. The Chaco has been suffering a rapid decline is the last 50 years, mainly due to deforestation for planting soy bean (Grau et al. 2005, Fearnside 2001, Kaimowitz & Smith 2001). In northwestern Argentina, the Chaco domain lost 20% of its remaining area from 1972 to 2001 (Grau et al. 2005). In Bolivia, Chiquitano forest, the Chaco lost 48% of its original area, also because of establishment of agricultural fields (Steininger et al. 2001). The Atlantic Forest domain has only 28% of its original area (Rezende et al. 2018). Due to the Atlantic Forest and Chaco loss of area in the past, and the current situation in areas where the species occurs, there is an inferred population size reduction of 10-20% in 70 years (three generations, based on the phenology of the host tree), Tropicoporus drechsleri is classified as Vulnerable.

Population Trend: Decreasing


Habitat and Ecology

The species is parasitic, likely host specific on Cordia americana. Its range is estimated to follow that of its host’s in the Atlantic Forest (Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay), Chaco (Argentina and possible in Bolivia and Paraguay), and likely in Montes Ribereños (Uruguay).

Subtropical/Tropical Dry ForestSubtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland Forest

Threats

Tropicoporus drechsleri and its host, Cordia americana, are mainly distributed in two domains, the Atlantic Forest and the Chaco. Both domains are considered deforestation hotspots, suffering loss of area mainly due to agriculture and human occupation (Gasparri & Grau 2009, Pinto et al. 2006). The species is also threatened by ‘savannization’ of the tropical forests in South America caused by climate change (Salazar et al. 2007).

Housing & urban areasAgro-industry farmingAgro-industry plantationsAgro-industry grazing, ranching or farmingIncrease in fire frequency/intensityHabitat shifting & alterationDroughts

Conservation Actions

The main action towards the conservation of the species is to protect the areas where its host occurs by implementing Conservation Units. In protected areas the decline is substantially reduced. In the Atlantic Forest of Paraguay, between 1989 and 2000 the deforestation in major protected areas was 6.07%, contrasting with the almost 80% loss of areas in unprotected sites. These data leave no doubt about the importance of protection policies.

Site/area protectionAwareness & communicationsPolicies and regulations

Research needed

More surveys are needed to confirm estimated sites of occurrence, as well as to better understand its distribution, phenology and ecology.

Population size, distribution & trendsLife history & ecology

Use and Trade

None known.


Bibliography

Boletta, P. E., Ravelo, A. C., Planchuelo, A. M., & Grilli, M. (2006). Assessing deforestation in the Argentine Chaco. Forest Ecology and Management, 228(1-3), 108–114. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.02.045
Fearnside, P. M. (2001) Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil. Environmental Conservation 28: 23– 38.
Gasparri, N. Ignacio & Grau, H. Ricardo (1972–2007) Deforestation and fragmentation of Chaco dry forest in NW Argentina. Forest Ecology And Management, [s.l.], v. 258, n. 6, pp. 913-921. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.02.024.
Grau, H. R., Gasparri, N. I., & Aide, T. M. (2005). Agriculture expansion and deforestation in seasonally dry forests of north-west Argentina. Environmental Conservation, 32(02), 140. doi:10.1017/s0376892905002092
Huang, C., Kim, S., Altstatt, A., Townshend, J. R. G., Davis, P., Song, K., & Musinsky, J. (2007). Rapid loss of Paraguay’s Atlantic forest and the status of protected areas — A Landsat assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 106(4), 460–466. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.016
  Izquierdo, A. E., De Angelo, C. D. & Aide, T. M. (2008) Thirty years of human demography and land-use change in the Atlantic Forest of Misiones, Argentina: An evaluation of the forest transition model. Ecology and Society 13(2): 3. http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art3/.
  Kaimowitz, D. & Smith, J. (2001) Soybean technology and the loss of natural vegetation in Brazil and Bolivia. In: Agricultural Technologies and Tropical Deforestation, ed. A. Angelsen & D. Kaimowitz, pp. 195–211. Oxon, UK: CABI Publishing
  Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853-858.
  Pinto, L. P., Bedê, L., Paese, A., Fonseca, M., Paglia, A. & Lamas, I. (2006) Mata Atlântica brasileira: Os desafios para a conservação da biodiversidade de um hotspot mundial. In: Rocha, C. F. D., Begallo, H. D., Sluys, M. V. & Alves, M. A. S. (eds.), Biologia da conservaão: Essências, 1º Edición, Rima Editora.
Rezende, C.L., Scarano, F. R., Assad, E. D., Joly, C. A., Metzger, J. P., Strassburg, B. B. N.; Tabarelli, M., Fonseca, G. A., Mittermeier, R. A. (2018) From hotspot to hopespot: An opportunity for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Perspectives In Ecology And Conservation 16(4): 208-214. .
Rivers, M. C., Bachman, S. P., Meagher, T. R., Lughanda, E. N. & Brummitt, N. A. (2010) Subpopulations, locations and fragmentation: applying IUCN red list criteria to herbarium specimen data. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(7): 2071–2085. doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9826-9
Salazar, L. F., Nobre, C. A., & Oyama, M. D. (2007). Climate change consequences on the biome distribution in tropical South America. Geophysical Research Letters, 34(9). doi:10.1029/2007gl029695
Salvador-Montoya, C. A., Costa-Rezende, D. H., Ferreira-Lopes, V., Borba-Silva, M. A. & Popoff, O. F. (2018) Tropicoporus drechsleri (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota), a new species in the “Inonotus linteus” complex from northern Argentina. Phytotaxa 338(1): 75-89 http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.1.6.
Steininger, M. K., Tucker, C. J., Ersts, P., Killeen, T. J., Villegas, Z., & Hecht, S. B. (2001). Clearance and Fragmentation of Tropical Deciduous Forest in the Tierras Bajas, Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Conservation Biology, 15(4): 856–866. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015004856.x


Known distribution - countries

Regional Population and Trends

Country Trend Redlisted